The Supreme Court has ruled that it is not “mandatory” to appoint a high court judge as the chairperson of State Electricity Regulatory Commission (SERC), which determines power tariff, in the states.
The path-breaking verdict put to rest the vexatious question that had come to light due to conflicting judgements of Gujarat and the Madras high courts on the interpretation of a provision of the Electricity Act on the appointment of the Chairperson of the State Electricity Regulatory Commission.
Section 84 (2) of the Act said that the state government “may” appoint “any person as the chairperson from amongst the persons, who is, or has been, a Judge of the High Court”.
The Madras High Court, on February 7, 2014, held that that there was no such mandatory requirement to appoint a high court judge as the chairperson of Tamil Nadu State Electricity Commission. However, there was an option to appoint a judge, it had said. Read More
Latest posts by ET Energy World (see all)
- Govt mulls selling its 65% stake in Power Finance Corporation to REC - September 24, 2018
- India Will Register Highest GDP, Energy Growth Among Nations Through 2040: OPEC - September 24, 2018
- Punjab govt approves 4,000 MW thermal plant at Rupnagar - September 22, 2018